Thank you for visiting nature.com. Additionally, the literature review should be updated to reflect current gaps, as there are several existing articles to date that offer engagement implementation examples, which was stated as a gap and strength of current paper. By the time you have accrued enough data to write a manuscript, you will likely want to publish as soon as possible. We strive to be open; if our expectations for a revision are unclear, we welcome further discussion by e-mail or phone. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. this is editorial consideration. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. If anything, that notification is a signal to get ready for the next step. Reviewing peer review. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. Please do not hesitate to contact us to learn more about our writing services. "Under consideration" in some journals like nature is equivalent to " with the editor" in other journals such as Elsevier and Springer publications. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Search for jobs related to Manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods or hire on the world's largest freelancing marketplace with 20m+ jobs. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. We will acknowledge receipt of your submitted manuscript by email. Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. and JavaScript. [CDATA[> After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONEs publication criteria as it currently stands. Yes, this is normal. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. If using MS Word, we recommend you format your manuscript with the Nature MS Word template (www Manuscript status If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at Nature Communications, a copy of the related In other words, related manuscript files means any other manuscript that overlaps with the. Lines 379 to 387: It would be useful if the authors could highlight on how they incorporated the views of the stakeholders in each step, probably in a Table format. full consideration means we might consider rejecting it too. reach a conclusion of interest to an interdisciplinary readership. Our writing experts guarantee your manuscript will be 100% worthy of acceptance. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. Thank you, -k. -kaveh-. . Besides scope, novelty, potential interest, and practical value, we look at the meat of the paper: have the authors justified the advance over previous methods? [CDATA[// >Reviews for "Nature Methods" - Page 1 - SciRev For example; What was the final goal and what stakeholder input lead to that outcome. . The goals of peer review are both lofty and mundane. Unfortunately, the majority of manuscripts received by publishing houses are immediately rejected. Hopefully, the exact situation will. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). ISSN 1548-7105 (online) Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Before final acceptance, we request that corresponding authors of accepted papers link their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) to their manuscript tracking system account ORCID instructions. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Prospective authors are encouraged to consider whether their work attends appropriately to marginalized scholarship. We do, however, support the posting of preprints; you can find out more here. Formation of cafeteria intervention committee. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees. [CDATA[// >
